Perception, Knowledge, and Past Experience The dark gray rock of the moon will always look highly luminous to us when seen in the dark night sky, whether or not we are conscious of its true reflectance. Beginning students of perception soon learn that what we perceive is independent of what we know about the objects and events in the scene. Illusions do not disappear or diminish simply because we know they are illusions. Conversely, achieving veridicality is not based on knowing what is there in the world. An airplane high in the sky looks small despite our knowledge of its large size, whereas an unfamiliar object on the distant ground will generally be seen in its true size despite our lack of knowledge of what it is. A single black surface will never look black when only it is illuminated in a dark surround, no matter how often we are allowed to see that it is black by turning on the room lights. The dark gray rock of the moon will always look highly luminous to us when seen in the dark night sky, whether or not we are conscious of its true reflectance. Virtually every phenomenon discussed in this text illustrates the autonomy of perception from cognitive processing on a conceptual or linguistic level. We can only speculate about the reasons for this independence. But one of them surely is that perception is stimulus bound. By its very definition, perception is based upon—–even if not entirely determined by—–the stimulus. Therefore, if a particular stimulus pattern falls upon the retina—–a triangle, for example—–it stands to reason that the perception will in some sense conform to it—–in this case, to a triangular configuration—–even if we find out that the three contours derive from object contours that are in entirely different planes in the world or from contours that are curvilinear but happen to be viewed head- on. Or, to give another example, if a stimulus cue informs us that one object is behind another, knowing it is actually in front will have no effect.